Why have children if you can’t afford them?

Amidst all the discussion of women, children, marriage, money and having it “all,” the proverbial elephant in the room is this: Why are women still having children when they can’t afford them? In today’s New York Times, yet another article discusses women and children. This time, it’s about the growth in the number of women who are having children alone. Decades ago this was a race issue, now it is a class issue with women in lower economic classes having children they cannot afford to raise on their salaries.

What is it that drives these women? Is it long-held social mores in which it simply a given that you will get pregnant and have a baby even if you cannot afford the child? Is it what a teenage girl told me several years ago about her decision to get pregnant and have a child: it’s something I can do and I’ve got nothing else to look forward to in life. Do we really want to bring children into this world because of tradition or a lack of a rewarding future? It’s time to talk about why we have children.

Why I Am Not A Girl

Put bluntly: I was never told I was one.

Now it seems that scientific experiments are proving that not being told you’re a girl…and by that I mean not being told be girls are sugar and spice and everything nice, always playing with Barbie and that looks are the most important thing is life…is a good thing.

New studies explored in today’s HuffingtonPost article reveal that children start learning gender roles as early as 30 months old. And parents can either help instill traditional gender roles or they can work to raise women and men who aren’t defined by them.

I grew up in a household of women so you would actually think I’d be pretty traditional. But then I was raised by a pack of nontraditional women who made their own money, fixed their own toilets, mowed their own grass, took out their own garbage. Importantly, they taught by example that women could do anything they set their mind to.

I encourage everyone to read the article linked above because it offers seven of the best pieces of advice I’ve read anywhere on how to raise women to be women—instead of princesses. See Lesson Four for more on that.

"Half the Sky? Feminism comes to China."

10 months ago

What is your “all”? A Response to Anne-Marie Slaughter

It took me a few days to decide whether or not to weigh in on the latest “can you have it all” debate prompted by Anne-Marie Slaughter’s piece in The Atlantic. First I wanted to read it, instead of having a knee-jerk reaction to it.

I take issue with this article, even though Slaughter makes strong arguments for the changes necessary to making workplaces more amenable to family life—no matter what your “family” looks like.

But as I do with most discussions of having it “all,” I found myself wondering what my grandmother would say over all this sturm und drang of having a career, raising children, dealing with a husband who may or may not help out, etc. etc. She raised six children, ran a farm, helped bring up her grandchildren, bought her own house when she was in her 60s and divorced that same decade after 40 years in a marriage that rarely, if ever, made her happy. I never once heard her say “I can’t do this all.” She worked two or three jobs after leaving the poverty of that farm in Eastern Utah to make enough money for a down payment on her own home. This I think was her proudest achievement—financial independence. She worked every day of her life and she did not distinguish between cooking meals for family or cleaning rooms in hotels for what constituted work. She did not have time to think about “work-life” balance. She did not expect to have it all. What she taught me about feminism and the women’s movement was all that it got us was the opportunity to choose our own way in the world. That was a remarkable achievement. But it comes with responsibility. What we do with those choices, well, that is up to us.

I also think about all the women, including my mother who was never married and has always worked, who do not have the money or the time to sit down and write a multi-page article (and I will assume Slaughter was paid for it) about how hard it is to be wealthy and educated in America. I think of my cousin who has raised a beautiful young woman while working full-time and then starting her own business. Never once have I heard her say “I can’t do it all.” She is my role model for motherhood and her husband is my role model for fatherhood. Are they perfect? No and they wouldn’t want to be. But they don’t wring their hands every time it’s tough to get up in the morning to go to work—for him, to building sites where he will work in all kinds of weather to make certain they can pay for her tuition and their mortgage. She will work until 1 or 2 in the morning to do the same. Maybe this is because we both grew up with mothers and a grandmother who worked hard to make ends meet and to make certain we had opportunities to grow and thrive. We learned to be happy with what we had not what we thought we should have.

I had thought I would take a less hard-line approach on this. That I’d try to be reasonable. I would try to be understanding because I don’t have children, I am not married, I must not know what it is like to “balance” my life. But I’m done being reasonable. You cannot have it all, especially if your “all” is so caught up in what society thinks your “all” should be. I am one of those women who friends worry about telling me about their decisions to stay home. I remember one conversation with a good friend on her last day of work. She professed to be afraid to tell me about her decision. I said, “You worked for 22 years, now you want to be with your child. Why would I have anything to say to that.”

What it comes down to, I think, is defining what your “all” is and stop worrying about what everybody else thinks of your decision. I do believe we all need to fight for universal inexpensive child care, I think flex time is important for everyone—including friends without children who also take care of parents, have spouses who need them, or those of us with neither who stand in as parents for nieces, nephews, godchildren whenever necessary. Or maybe just so we can live an enriching life outside the old 9 to 5.

I do think we need women who stay in the workplace to change the workplace, but not at the expense of themselves and their sanity.

So I ask you: “What is your “all?” How would you live your life if you could do anything you want? Oh wait, you are a woman living in 21st century America. You pretty much can do anything you want with your life. And don’t give me some excuse that you can’t. If my grandmother could buy a house when she was 60, and work three jobs to do it, I’ve really got no use for excuses. So stop pointing fingers at each other and go find your “all.”

Unlocking women’s potential? What does it take…

McKinsey & Co., along with the Wall Street Journal, weighed in what is keeping women from the “C-Suite” in a recent study as part of the Journal’s Task Force for Women in the Economy.

The entire report can be downloaded here. Task Force for Women in the Economy.

While I don’t believe that “aspiring to the C-Suite” is the only measurement of success for women in the economy, I do agree with the report’s stated goal of quantifying the odds for women versus men when it comes to ascending to higher levels of an organization.

If we desire to be at the helm of companies—large, small or medium-size—what are companies doing to make certain we have the same access as men? But I think a deeper question to ask is if we don’t aspire to the corner office—according to this study 59 percent of the woman surveyed didn’t want these jobs—what do we aspire to? Why do we judge what women want in their lives against what men want? Shouldn’t we also ask men if they aspire to these positions?

Look for more posts as I dig into the report in the next few weeks.

Worth watching.

The Sex Issue--Foreign Policy Magazine Weighs In

1 year ago

Worst Places to Be a Woman

1 year ago

Cultural Differences

At the Marketing to Women conference, Tom Beck of Enlighten mentioned a link that allows you to create a visual search to explore cultural differences. Type in “moms,” “women,” “freedom” or any other search terms and you’ll see how different cultures visualize these results.

1 year ago

Marketing to Women—Surprising Data

Some surprising data came out of Tuesday’s Marketing to Women conference in Chicago. After decades of women becoming more and more happy about being women (as opposed to saying they wish they were a man), Gen Z women (ages 18-22) increasingly say they would rather have been born male.

Data from GfK Roper on this topic stretches back to 1946 when 25 percent of women surveyed said they would rather have been born a man. By 1993 that percentage had dropped to 14 percent and today only 9 percent of women say they would rather have been born a man. But a subset, the Gen Zs, increasingly think it’s better to be a guy—up to 13 percent say they wish they had been born male. This statistic deserves more investigation. Does it hold up and why would younger women desire to be male in a world where women increasingly are in power? 

New numbers from Boston Consulting Group show that women continue to be the primary shoppers around the world—$12 trillion in annual spending and women are making more money. There will be a $5 trillion increase in women’s wealth in the next five years. In China, by 2020 women will three times the amount they earned in 2010.